movie Stargate

May 31, 2010

No one expects the fourth seq…

Filed under: Uncategorized — moviestargate @ 12:29 pm

No one expects the fourth sequel to a horror film to be any good, but the "Saw" series has grown particularly redundant. "Saw V" is as rote and mechanical as one of Jigsaw's traps, though at least Jigsaw's traps are suspenseful and ingenious. The movie is neither of those things.

It begins immediately after the events of

"Saw IV,"

which the movie assumes you have watched quite recently. It definitely does not assume that you watched the movie once, a year ago, and forgot everything about it once you had written your review. You may remember (or maybe Wikipedia has reminded you) that a cop named Hoffman (Costas Mandylor) was revealed to be an accomplice to Jigsaw (Tobin Bell), the gravel-voiced trickster whose fiendishly clever devices have killed dozens and entertained millions. Now Hoffman is accepting commendations for solving the case, but FBI Agent Strahm (Scott Patterson) is starting to catch on that he, Hoffman, is actually a bad guy.

Strahm, who was injured in Jigsaw's final orchestration, follows his hunch and pores over the old Jigsaw case files. As he does this, the film shows us flashbacks to Jigsaw and Hoffman's prior interactions, thus allowing Jigsaw — the franchise's central figure — to continue to be a major character even though his death occurred way back in

"Saw III."

(Flashbacks are how he managed to be all over "Saw IV," too.) After we are shown these vignettes, Strahm always deduces something new about Hoffman, something he could only deduce if he had seen the flashbacks along with us. I don't know how he's doing that, but it's a pretty neat skill for a detective to have.

Meanwhile, five strangers are trapped in a series of Jigsaw-style games, forced to work together (or slowly kill one another) in order to survive. Two of them are played by Julie Benz and Meagan Good. IMDB says their characters are named Brit and Luba, but I don't think the movie ever tells us that. I'm pretty sure I would remember if someone had been called "Luba."

Anyway, did I mention it's all pretty routine by now? Whatever wit or cleverness this series had has long since dried up. Even viewers who keep coming back for the blood 'n' gore are liable to be disappointed: While there's plenty of it, it's rarely the result of anything creative or "fun." It's like the movie isn't even trying to appeal to its most devoted fanbase. I do admire the ability to keep retroactively adding information to the story —

oh, it turns out that while THIS was happening, so was this OTHER thing!

– but that device works best when there was a master plan in place at the outset, not when you're making it up as you go.

The first-time director is David Hackl, who worked as assistant director on the last two entries and evidently learned plenty from his bosses. I might as well quote my review of "Saw IV," since it's still applicable: "[His] preference is to shoot everything as if he were a film student making a Nine Inch Nails video. You get that metallic swooshing sound effect over everything, jittery jump cuts in the middle of people's sentences, and eerie, atonal music playing almost constantly. All of these devices are employed even in the non-suspenseful scenes in the hopes of creating a false sense of intensity."

The film's promotional tagline is "You won't believe how it ends." And it's true: I was expecting one of those trademark "Saw" surprise twists, and instead I got an anti-climax that made me say "So what?" Is that what they meant? Is the series over now? The faux-intellectual moralizing is beyond absurd, Jigsaw is a joke who's been dead for two films, and none of the other surviving characters are even slightly interesting. Set the timer and let this thing explode, would you?

Grade: D

Rated R, a lot of harsh profanity, abundant graphic violence and gore

May 30, 2010

Gangs of New York review

Filed under: Uncategorized — moviestargate @ 11:19 pm

Editor's Note

Our review of

Gangs Of New York
(Blu-Ray)

, published July 1st, 2008, is also available.

The Charge

America was born in the streets.

Opening Statement

Considered by many to the greatest living director working today, Martin
Scorsese has helmed some of the most critically acclaimed films, including

Taxi Driver

,

Raging Bull

, the remake
of

Cape Fear

and the feel good mob
flick

GoodFellas

. In 2003, Scorsese
finally brought to the screen—after a nearly 20 year struggle, a troubled
production, and negative buzz—the Oscar nominated

Gangs of New
York

. Starring Leonardo DiCaprio (

Titanic

,

Romeo + Juliet

), Cameron Diaz (

The Mask

,

Charlie's Angels

), and Daniel
Day-Lewis (

My Left Foot

),

Gangs of New York

fights its way onto
DVD in a new two-disc set care of Miramax. Let the grudge match begin!

Facts of the Case


Gangs of New York

take place in the grime and dirt of the 1840s. It is
a time when the city looks far more like a melting pot of sewage than the New
York we're used to seeing. In the Five Points district, various locals and
immigrants fight to the death over a piece of Miss Liberty's land. As the film
opens we see Irish Priest Vallon (Liam Neeson,

Rob Roy

) and his band of
"Dead Rabbits" as they prepare for a battle against Bill "The
Butcher" Cutting (Day-Lewis), a vicious beast who rules his land with an
iron fist. On the streets the two groups meet, each bashing the hell out of each
other with knives, axes, and bats. When the battle finally ends with Vallon's
death at the hands of Cutting, it looks as if it's all over for the Dead
Rabbits. Before the day is through, Vallon's son Amsterdam is able to escape
into the catacombs beneath the Manhattan skyline.

After spending years in a reform school, Amsterdam (now played by DiCaprio)
returns to the Five Points in search of revenge for his father's death. When he
finally meets up with Cutting, Amsterdam finds himself mesmerized by his
charisma and grip on the city. Amsterdam soon becomes what appears to be
Cutting's right hand man, running errands and being taught how to kill a man
properly. As Amsterdam struggles with his feelings for a female pickpocket
(Diaz), he begins to devise a scheme to reinstate the Dead Rabbits (whose name
has been banned from the Five Points by the Butcher) and exact his revenge for
the death of his father.

The Evidence

Scorsese's

Gangs of New York

is a big, gigantic, violent sprawling
epic that is, at its core, a movie about the underbelly of America's past. This
is a bloody, beastly film that is a no holds barred fictional look at what it
took for immigrants and outcasts to carve out a niche of their own in one of the
most dangerous cities in America. The history of

Gangs of New York

is one
fraught with disappointment and frustration. Scorsese had been trying to bring
the film to the screen for decades, and after a few rumored problems on the set,
the film went on to make only around $80 million at the box office. It also went
head-to-head with Steven Spielberg's hit

Catch Me If You Can

, also
starring DiCaprio, during the bustling Christmas movie season. Basically, it was
Leo vs. Leo, and Leo won (how shocking). And though it was nominated for
multiple Oscars (including Best Director and Best Actor), the film took home not
a single gold statue.

In

Gangs of New York

, the memorable character running ahead of the
pack is Daniel Day-Lewis' Bill the Butcher, a mean son of a bitch that instills
as much fear as he does laughter. In what may be a tour-de-force performance of
the decade, Day-Lewis destroys the scenery with a brash New York accent and pit
bull demeanor that is one part mesmerizing and another part insane. Bill is a
man that is feared by all, and with his glass eye (which he likes to tap from
time to time with a knife tip) and towering top hat, he is as close as you can
come to the devil incarnate. In fact, Day-Lewis' performance is so memorable and
enticing that it makes the rest of the performers pale in comparison. It's
interesting to note that Day-Lewis was actually "retired" from
filmmaking and working as a cobbler when Scorsese enticed him back into acting
for

Gangs of New York

.

Leonardo DiCaprio does his best brooding as Amsterdam, a boy consumed with
hatred, anger, fear, and lust. Though he does a passable job here, I've never
found DiCaprio to be an overtly moving actor—in

Gangs of New York

he tends to scowl a lot, then look sad, then he scowls a little more. Cameron
Diaz, an actress who always looks good but fares better in comedy than drama, is
the weak link of this group. Diaz's accent flutters in and out of range a few
times, making for a snicker-inducing performance. In fact, the truth is that her
role was not

really

needed—she's just window dressing for DiCaprio
make goo-goo eyes at. Other fine notables include John C. Reilly (

Magnolia

) as a corrupt police officer,
Brendan Gleeson (

Braveheart

) as a
hired clubber/politician, and Oscar winner Jim Broadbent (

Iris

,

Moulin
Rouge

) as the real life inspired politician William "Boss"
Tweed.

Most impressive are the sets and locations (filmed overseas) that Scorsese
utilizes. His version of early New York is so grimy—so hideously
dirty—that it rivals the Hughes Brothers' London in

From Hell

. There isn't a single tooth or
fingernail that's clean, each sporting a thick coating of dirt and grease. In
this vision, New York is a place inhabited by thieves and politicians, the
poverty stricken and the brutal, each vying for a piece of the American pie. In
one fantastic shot, Scorsese pulls back to show the majesty of the
production—a huge landscape of bustling people among a wooden tower. If
the film is worth seeing for any single reason it's for Dante Ferretti's epic
production design.

I have no qualms in saying that I really enjoyed

Gangs of New York

.
This movie won't be to everyone's tastes—the beginning battle is
shockingly well filmed, but it's brutal and bloody—those who like
Scorsese's work will most likely find many things to like. It may not rank as
one of Marty's best efforts, but it sure is damn entertaining.


Gangs of New York

is presented in its original aspect ratio of 2.35:1
widescreen with an anamorphic enhancement. The nearly three hour epic is spread
across two discs, the second part being the longest of the two. Generally
speaking this transfer is in great shape, save for some surprising dirt and
grain in the image. Since

Gangs of New York

is a brand spanking new film,
it was a bit disappointing to see such imperfections in the image. However,
putting that complaint aside the transfer is great—colors and black levels
are all solid and dark with the flesh tones represented accurately. All in all
this transfer isn't reference quality, but it should look good to fans of the
film.

The soundtrack is presented in two options: DTS 5.1 Surround and Dolby
Digital 5.1 Surround, both in English. Truth be told, both of these tracks will
do wonders on your surround sound system—there's a multitude of
directional effects and sounds to be found in both mixes, with the DTS track
boasting a bit better clarity. I noticed no distortion or hiss in the mix,
making for a great listen. One of the best things about the movie (and these
soundtracks) is the Oscar nominated U2 song "The Hands that Built
America" and composer Howard Shore's (

The Lord of the Rings

trilogy,

The Silence of the Lambs

)
bombastic music score. Also included on this set are English and French
subtitles, as well as a Dolby Digital 5.1 Surround track in French.

A few well produced extras have been included on this set, making this is a
very well produced special edition by Miramax. Here's a rundown of what's on
this two-disc set:


Commentary by Director Martin Scorsese

: Those who know anything about
Marty know that he's a mile-a-minute talker who has a bountiful knowledge of
cinema, film production, and movie history, The commentary for

Gangs of New
York

doesn't disappoint with oodles and oodles of stories about the
production, the historical background on the film, and the real gangs of New
York. Unfortunately, there isn't a lot to be heard about the shoot's troubled
history—but no matter, this is a still a worthwhile commentary track that
is spread across the length of both discs.


"Exploring the Sets of Gangs of New York," ""Sandy
Powell's Costume Design," "The History of the Five Points," and
"Dante Ferretti's Set Design" Featurettes

: Each one of these
focuses on various aspects of the film's production. On "Set Design,"
we get a first hand glimpse at what it took for Dante Ferretti to bring
Scorsese's vision to the big screen. In "Costume Design" we're given a
look at—how shocking—Sandy Powell's period piece costumes and how
expansive it was to get all those extras looking just right. "Exploring the
Sets" offers viewers a chance to see the director and the production
designer walking around their sets and giving us a look at the magnitude of the
production. Also included is a little bonus pop-up window that allows for a 360
degree look at the set (multi angle option). In "The History of the Five
Points" we're given historical background on the real life story of

Gangs of New York

with comments by various scholars and people of
importance. Out of the four I found the historical featurette to be the most
intriguing. All in all, these well produced (if all too brief) featurettes
should give viewers a good idea of what went into the making of the film.


"The Real Gangs of New York" Documentary

: This half-hour
documentary
was originally aired on the Discovery Channel. For those looking for
background information about the real struggles of New Yorkers in the 1800s,
this is a good place to start. Featuring archival pictures, documents, writings,
and comments by scholars, this is a fine little piece that takes you beyond
Scorsese's movie and into real life. Though I would have liked this to have been
a bit longer, overall it's a well produced supplement.

Finally there is a theatrical trailer and teaser trailer for the film (one
in anamorphic widescreen and the other in full frame), a music video for the
song "The Hands That Built America" by the rock group U2, a Five
Points Study Guide, and The Five Points Vocabulary (from 1859's "The
Rogue's Lexicon" by George Matsell).

• Commentary by Director Martin Scorsese

• "Uncovering the Real Gangs of New York" Documentary

• Costume Design Featurette

• Set Design Featurette

• History of the Five Points Featurette

• "Exploring the Sets of Gangs of New York" with Multi Angle Option

• U2 Music Video "The Hands that Built America"

• Theatrical Trailer

• Teaser Trailer

• The Five Points Study Guide

• The Five Points Vocabulary

May 29, 2010

In the Valley of Elah review

Filed under: Uncategorized — moviestargate @ 9:19 pm

features some fine acting and a touchstone gist matter, but I wasn?t nearly as impressed as I hope I would be by a film with this pedigree.

?In the Valley of Elah?

Warner Spontaneous Films

Directed by Paul Haggis

Starring Tommy Lee Jones, Charlize Theron, Jason Patric, Susan Sarandon, James Franco, Barry Corbin and Josh Brolin Rated R

State of Play full video dvd

3 Stars

?In the Valley of Elah? is the first of the consequential Oscar-bait films of the attack season. It?s also the head of a slew of anti-Iraq joust with films that force be surging into big theaters over the next few months. It?s a film filled with Academy Bestowal winning actors and an Oscar favorite vice-president at the helm. The snooty stratagems critic in me should be thrilled.

Meh.

I won?t deny that ?In the Valley of Elah? features some dainty acting and a benchmark dominate matter, but I wasn?t as good as as impressed as I thought I would be by a film with this pedigree. The story is a bit too imposing repayment for its own good, ends poorly and just isn?t all that intriguing. Perhaps most unsettled, after spending two hours with these characters I?m left with the big lesson admission that in combat changes people.

You think?

On the positive side, Tommy Lee Jones is very good, as in, probable Oscar nomination good. His carrying out unexcelled makes the movie well worth your time. Jones plays Hank Deerfield, a retired military MP who is informed that his son, recently returned from Iraq, has gone missing. Hank drives to Texas to search for his boy, teams up with a local patrol officer (Charlize Theron) and ends up learning that his son has been killed. The film turns into a police research, with Hank determined to find out what happened to his son, undisturbed as the military seems impartial to his loss.

Jones plays the role as a man struggling to bottle up the heartache and anger at bay long enough to boon out what happened, and it?s remarkable to sit with the emotions building up behind the man?s eyes. Theron is also quite good, although she suffers in contrasting to Jones.

The bottom line is that there?s some vast accoutrements here, but ?In the Valley of Elah? suffers from an unrelenting dismal air and an ending that seems out of character and far too politicized to work in the framework of the mistiness. This is a good cinema with a peerless show at the center, perfectly not quite the work of genius most people were gravid.

The requested URL /pages/full…

Filed under: Uncategorized — moviestargate @ 12:59 am

The requested URL /pages/full/MoneyPit.shtml was not found on this server.

Download Terminator Salvation Full Movie dvd

May 28, 2010

Liar Liar In Liar Liar , Jim …

Filed under: Uncategorized — moviestargate @ 1:15 am

Liar Liar

In

Liar Liar

, Jim Carrey's transition is more
subtle. The relevant social problem attacked here (in more ways than
one) are dysfunctional parents, and like in


The Cable Guy


, neglected
children. Carrey plays Fletcher Reede, a lawyer who misses his son's
birthday to advance his partnership application in the law firm he
works at. He's defending an adulterous mother who, thanks to Carrey's
prompting, feels victimised by her husband and wants half the estate
and custody of their children even though she's clearly unfit to be a
parent.

At the birthday party, a depressed little Max (Justin Cooper)
wishes that his father would stop lying for one day. The high-energy
action begins, as Max's wish immediately comes true with disastrous
consequences: Carrey is immediately thrown out of his lover's bed,
gets his car towed, gets slapped (literally and figuratively) now and
then, kicks his own butt, and finally lands in jail for contempt of
the court. You would think a premise like "tell the truth no matter
what" would get tired really soon, but Carrey milks it for all it's
worth with his amazing acting ability and his thousand expression
face.

Inglourious Basterds full video download bluray

The most hilarious sequence of the movie (where Carrey goes nuts) is
during the board of directors meeting where Carrey is forced to state
the truth about the board members. The insults he delivers are
standard, but done in his own inimitable style, they actually make the
audience laugh just as loud as the people on the screen. Another
hilarious sequence is the final airport sequence where Carrey orders a
plane to pull over, which requires a tolerance for outlandish plot
resolutions.

All the other actors in the movie are secondary here, though there is
one situation where Cary Elwes manages to invoke some laughs with his
version of "the claw". The script isn't the greatest, and even though
the movie is hilarious, I really think it is a shame that Carrey has
to pander to his traditional audiences before they accept him in more
experimental roles. I think a wise decision was made to limit this to
less than 90 minutes, and adding some hilarious out-takes at the end.

You would think that Carrey would be rid of his hyperactiveness once
filming is done. The thing is that every TV interview I've seen of
him involves being just as hyperactive, if not more. I am not one to
idolise movie stars, but I'd argue Jim Carrey deserves all the
adulation that he gets.

May 27, 2010

Factory Girl (2007)

Filed under: Uncategorized — moviestargate @ 9:49 pm

As the latest round of celebrity wannabes buzzes through the tryout halls of “American Idol,” the zeitgeist seems primed for the release of “Factory Girl.”

After all, the movie revisits the life of Edie Sedgwick, a 1960s trust-fund princess and socialite, whose only qualifications for fame were her luminous beauty, some art-school experience and relentless desire. In her ultimately tragic quest to become one of Andy Warhol’s starlets, she is something of a spiritual ancestor to all those equally desperate hopefuls clamoring for three minutes with Simon, Randy and Paula.


Sienna Miller portrays doomed Warhol muse Edie Sedgwick in the superficial biopic.
Sienna Miller portrays doomed Warhol muse Edie Sedgwick in the superficial biopic. (By Patti Perret — Weinstein Company Via Bloomberg News)

var technorati = new Technorati() ;
technorati.setProperty(‘url’,'http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/08/AR2007020802111_Technorati.html’) ;
technorati.article = new item(‘\’Factory Girl\’ Gives Subject A 15-Minute Treatment’,'http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/08/AR2007020802111.html’,'As the latest round of celebrity wannabes buzzes through the tryout halls of “American Idol,” the zeitgeist seems primed for the release of “Factory Girl.”‘,‘Desson Thomson’) ;
document.write( technorati.getDisplaySidebar() );

Unfortunately the movie, directed by George Hickenlooper, believes that casting Sienna Miller as Sedgwick — one “it” girl playing another — is postmodern perspective enough. Yet a pretty face, a Warhol fright wig and a couple of dizzying drug montages are not enough to evoke a whole era.

“Factory Girl” follows Sedgwick from New England art school to New York, where she joins the Factory, the Manhattan aerie where artist and den mother Warhol (Guy Pearce) bestows ersatz fame on anyone who wins his blessing.

In short order — and for a heartbreakingly short time — Sedgwick becomes the chief firmament in Warhol’s universe. But their platonic romance of sorts goes awry, thanks to her drug use and to her sudden infatuation with a musician, played by Hayden Christensen. (This is based on her real-life relationship with Bob Dylan, who reportedly threatened legal action for the fictionalized portrayal in which the character spouts pretentious platitudes, makes an obnoxious boor of himself at the Factory, takes Edie for a ride on the back of his bike and, to show his cool contempt for materialism, sends the hog hurtling off a pier.)

In the movie’s elusive moral code, we are to accept this un-Dylan as Edie’s spiritual conscience. ("You’re as empty as your friend’s soup can.") But given his fictionalized status, we find ourselves preoccupied, wondering about the real story. And a sex scene between the actors is not only one of the most cliched, abstract-landscape-of-the-body encounters in recent memory, it gives us zero insight into their relationship.

“Factory Girl” isn’t a penetrating chronicle of Sedgwick’s life so much as a production designer’s highlights reel. Miller, a former model perhaps best known for her short engagement to Jude Law, turns in a dutiful performance in a poorly drawn role. Her turn amounts to a runway spectacle, as we watch her in an array of berets, hats, skirts, leopard-print underwear and far less. The portrayal of Sedgwick’s descent into drug oblivion feels similarly flip and shorthand, and she even looks glamorous — like a figure from Picasso’s blue period — huddling in the throes of addiction. All of this could have been achieved just as well by a spread in Vanity Fair.

As Mr. Tomato Soup Can himself, Pearce makes a quirkily fascinating figure, whose stuttery “hmms” and “ohs” are subterfuge for lethal passive-aggression. But thanks, again, to a screenplay that keeps things frustratingly on the surface, he’s never allowed to reveal much more. Given the ethos of Warhol’s art — which could be described as a knowingly superficial awareness of fame and commercialism — the movie’s lack of depth makes for unintended irony.

As if to make up for the story’s lack of heft, the movie weaves in faux-documentary scenes in which an older Sedgwick (just before her drug overdose in 1971 at the age of 28) speaks to an off-camera filmmaker about her life. Then, tacked on at the movie’s end, some who knew Sedgwick, including George Plimpton, Gerard Malanga and Nat Finkelstein, offer their thumbnail impressions. It’s a distracting ploy, and it prompts the viewer to reflect on what’s missing: a satisfying drama that takes us to another time and offers illumination about our own time and humanity.

Factory Girl (91 minutes, at area theaters) is rated R for drug use, nudity, profanity and sexual scenes.

Crazy Stranger review

Filed under: Uncategorized — moviestargate @ 10:00 am

Your usher to the dog days – music, movies, dining deals and a few new tricks

This summer let Caliente be your guide for the hottest in music, movies, food, skygazing and much, much more.


May 27, 2010 | 12:00 am

|

Comments

Veracruz is the adroit in of Mexico's oldest, be compelled varied music feather

Ask most any person outside of Mexico what that country's best known musical style is and the answer inevitably will be mariachi. Understandably since mariachi is Mexico's most popular musical export. But there's another musical genre from Mexico. It's the son jarocho from the east coast Mex…


May 27, 2010 | 12:00 am

|

Comments

Disney danger provides secret places for vital Gyllenhaal

What's a dedicated thespian doing in sixth-century armor, leaping walled citadels in a $150 million Walt Disney sword-and-sandals saga adapted from a video game? "It's definitely a different type of movie than I've made before," says Jake Gyllenhaal, star of "Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time."


May 27, 2010 | 12:00 am

|

Comments

Here's our challenge: Over the next 100 days, try something new each week. Learn to use your cell phone or iPad. Turn off the TV for a day and write your best friend a letter – you know, on stationery with a stamp and envelope. We'll suggest something new each week to help you make the most …


May 27, 2010 | 12:00 am

|

Comments

Body introducing spicy shitoh for Tucson Unite Yourself contest

The first aromas were gentle as Peter Hiadzi prepared kpakpo shitoh at home last weekend. Then the sweet smell of onions caramelizing gave way to a spicy smokiness after he added a touch of shitoh. A few moments later it felt like a can of pepper spray had gone off somewhere in his house.


May 27, 2010 | 12:00 am

|

Comments

Latest news

Images from the 45th Annual Academy of Country Music Awards in Las Vegas on Sunday, April 18, 2010.
It's not easy putting together a music festival. For 23 years, the Tucson Chapter of the Vietnam Veterans of America has o…
"Sex and the City 2" is so over-the-top ridiculous, it plays
like a parody of what a sequel to the 2008 hit movie would…
Lee DeWyze, a paint store clerk who overcame his shyness to
impress "American Idol" judges and viewers with his spirit …
The first aromas were gentle as Peter Hiadzi prepared kpakpo shitoh at home last weekend. Then the sweet smell of onions c…
Arizona Opera hopes to go north this fall so that the company doesn't go south. No date has been set, but Arizona Opera pl…
The full moon rises at 7:34 tonight, a few minutes after sunset,
and sets at 5:40 a.m. Friday a little after sunrise.

Food Fight

Fluffy, studded with juicy blueberries or soaked with syrup.
Mmmmm, pancakes. Is there any better way to start the day?…

About AZNightBuzz

AZNightBuzz highlights music, bars and restaurants in Southern Arizona and provides visitors with an interesting and exciting look into the current scene. You can also find the latest entertainment news from the world of movies, television and more.

Contact AZNightBuzz editor Jaynelle Ramon at (520) 618-7805 or


editor@aznightbuzz.com


.

Become a Facebook fan of AZNightBuzz at


facebook.com/aznightbuzz


and follow us on Twitter at


twitter.com/AZNightBuzz


.

About Caliente

Caliente is the weekly entertainment section of the Arizona Daily Star. It can be found in the Star every Thursday.

Contact Caliente editor Inger Sandal at (520) 573-4131 or


isandal@azstarnet.com


.

The Gatekeeper (2002)

Filed under: Uncategorized — moviestargate @ 8:59 am

Busch appears in full regalia in “Die Mommie Die!,” a spoof of ’60s
melodramas. He’s Angela Arden, a preening over-the-hill singer who takes out
her frustrations on her husband and kids. The latter’s feelings toward her are
undisguised by the title.

If you’ve never seen Busch perform live, this is the next best thing.
He/she makes a glamorous entrance in the opening scene, set in a cemetery.
Recognized by a fan, Angela turns slowly around, an apparition dressed
entirely in white.

Such obvious gender bending may have been a riot onstage, where “Mommie”
originated. (Busch, a prolific playwright, did the screen adaptation.) Kabuki-
like performances are accepted in theater, but work less well on film, which
demands some semblance of reality.

Busch is no Jaye Davidson of “Crying Game” fame, and you somehow expect
that someone in Angela’s household would have noticed how large and ungainly
Mommie is and what a deep voice she has.

An unusually strong supporting cast takes to the task of deliberately
overacting. Frances Conroy of “Six Feet Under” is great fun as a much put-upon
maid who becomes Angela’s nemesis, shouting at her, “I always knew you were
nothing but trash washed over the Canadian border.” The movie also brings out
the ham in the fine character actor Philip Baker Hall (“Magnolia”). As
Angela’s producer husband, he expresses with great glee, not once but twice,
his motto for making movies: “Make it big, give it class, leave them with a
message.”

“Kill Bill” and “Scary Movie 3″ have nothing over “Mommie” in terms of
referencing past movies. Busch channels Gloria Swanson in a re-enactment of
her surrendering to the police in “Sunset Boulevard.”

But “Mommie” is flat at moments that call for over-the-top campiness, such
as Angela’s LSD-induced trip down memory lane. With Busch’s presence in the
title role, no one will confuse his vehicle with “Far From Heaven,” a
melodramatic send up that asked to be taken seriously. So “Die Mommie Die!”
winds up neither hilarious nor a credible spoof of a genre intent on spoofing
itself.



Advisory: Sexually suggestive scenes and language.

– Ruthe Stein



‘THE DEATH OF KLINGHOFFER’

SNOOZING VIEWER

Opera. Music by John Adams. Libretto by Alice Goodman. Starring Sanford
Sylvan, Yvonne Howard, Christopher Maltman, Kamel Boutros. Directed by Penny
Woolcock. (Not rated. 120 minutes. At the Rafael Film Center, San Rafael).



The combination of artistic sophistication and moral obtuseness that has
characterized the opera “The Death of Klinghoffer” ever since its 1991
premiere is ratcheted up to new levels in this repulsive new film version,
made for British television by director Penny Woolcock.

Originally conceived by stage director Peter Sellars in one of his more
blind and antic moments, “Klinghoffer” treats the 1985 hijacking of the cruise
liner Achille Lauro by Palestinian terrorists, who shot a wheelchair-using
Jewish American tourist and dumped his body into the ocean.

Even on the stage (the piece came to the San Francisco Opera, one of the co-
commissioners, in 1992) “Klinghoffer” was difficult to countenance, with its
arty posturing about the Middle East conflict and its willful insistence that
this tawdry, contemptible murder had a claim to some kind of moral standing.

But the realism of the screen makes matters far worse. Woolcock shoots the
action
in almost documentary fashion, dashing with handheld camera among the
swaggering hijackers and cowering hostages (one of whom, for the sake of
gratuitous shock value, suffers an epileptic seizure). There are many
flashbacks to the Holocaust and to decades worth of struggles between
Palestinians and Israelis, the latter indistinguishable from the SS.

Sellars’ original staging was a stylized, almost pageant-like affair, which
allowed the creators to claim descent for the piece from Bach’s Passions.
Without that fig leaf, the ugliness at the heart of the work — its ghoulish
feasting on the blood of an innocent and luckless victim — becomes all the
more apparent, most heinously in the obscene footage of Klinghoffer’s bloody
corpse spinning gracefully through the water.

John Adams’ score, with its chugging, propulsive rhythms punctuated by
lyrical interludes of unearthly beauty, is as skillfully contrived as ever,
and the musical execution, with the composer leading the London Symphony
Orchestra, is depressingly expert. Sanford Sylvan and Yvonne Howard as the
Klinghoffers, Christopher Maltman as the naively idealistic captain, and Kamel
Boutros as the sensitive, poetic terrorist Mamoud — he suffers, you see, as
he engages in murder — sing with a beauty that seems appalling under the
circumstances.

– Joshua Kosman



‘THE GATEKEEPER’

SNOOZING VIEWER

Drama. Written and directed by John Carlos Frey. Starring Frey, Michelle
Agnew, Tricia O’Kelley. (R. 103 minutes. At the Opera Plaza.)



With all the immigration issues facing California voters and legislators,
there is need for a film like “The Gatekeeper,” a risky low-budget independent
feature about a racist half-Mexican border guard who gets trapped in illegal
immigrant hell while undercover.

Writer, director and star John Carlos Frey is ambitious, but the fact that
“The Gatekeeper” has won awards at several smaller film festivals is probably
due to its unflinching politics rather than its achievements in filmmaking.
It’s a movie you want to like, but its sometimes laughably bad execution makes
that difficult.

Frey is Adam Fields, a U.S. Border Patrol agent who treats the illegal
immigrants he catches brutally. To say that he is hate-filled is an
understatement; he is a member of an underground racist organization led by a
conservative radio talk-show host who warns of the breakdown of America, a
country turning Mexican to the point where we will soon be “eating beans and
tortillas for the rest of our lives.”

But — surprise — he turns out to be half-Mexican, the son of a Mexican
prostitute, his father a white customer he never knew. In a clumsy scene, we
see Adam visiting his dying mother, his disgust at his family and heritage
obvious. He has kept his family secret from his fiancee (Tricia O’Kelley), a
blond California girl with a stuffy, conservative family.

The racist society hatches a strange, illogical plan: Adam will drop down
into Tijuana and infiltrate a group of Mexicans intending to immigrate, sneak
across the border with them while wearing a homing device and then, apparently,

the secret society will kill them all. Instead, things go wrong when the
group is itself gunned down by the people paid to get the illegal immigrants
across the border. Suddenly, Adam, with no documentation, is trapped, forced
to make drugs in dangerous conditions by a criminal gang that enslaves the
immigrants.

As he begins to understand the plight of immigrants, he befriends a pretty
young woman (Michelle Agnew), who becomes the sex slave and housekeeper of the
head criminal, and her young son. Although the film would have been better had
they spoken Spanish with English subtitles, the dire circumstances of the
illegal aliens in these scenes is the strongest section of “The Gatekeeper.”

While it is logical that many children of mixed ethnicity will have
identity crises, Adam’s situation is most puzzling. Since he speaks Spanish
fluently, we can assume he was raised by his mother in a Hispanic community,
so surely he already has witnessed firsthand the plight of underprivileged
immigrants. And because he is half-Mexican, why would he be accepted by a lily
white racist organization?

These are questions that could be answered, but “The Gatekeeper” needs a
subtler, more thoughtful screenplay to provide those answers. Illegal
immigration is a tough problem from both sides, one that deserves a film that
will explore those issues intelligently. For that, the film standard is still
“El Norte,” Gregory Nava’s 20-year-old masterpiece.

– G. Allen Johnson



Advisory: This film contains many scenes of violence, a sex scene with
brief nudity, a rape scene that is uncomfortable but not graphic, and scenes
of drug-making.

This was right before Adam wa…

Filed under: Uncategorized — moviestargate @ 7:44 am

The Condemned
This was truthful before Adam was deliver in a choke hold and asked to specify that his review was all a pretentiously mix up and that The Condemned is the Schindler's List of stranded convicts forced to kill to survive films.

The Condemned is a Stone Cold Steve Austin vehicle from the fine folks at the WWE. Had the movie just been a dumb action flick there's a good chance I might have recommended it. Alas, the film makers insist on making a statement and sending a message and do so with a sort of Neanderthal subtlety.

Download Book of Blood Full Movie hd

The Condemned features Robert Mammone as an egomaniacal TV producer who plots to create a hyper-reality show sensation on the internet. His plan involves rounding up some of the world's most evil criminals, dumping them on an island, and letting them kill one another off until only one remains. Of course all this divine carnage is to be captured by myriad tiny cameras he and his tech crew have set up all over the island.

The Condemned is a silly, preposterous, over-the-top actioneer that dares to commit the cardinal sin of trying to infuse a little social commentary. I could have forgiven the movie if only it were inspired or creative in its execution. Unfortunately, The Condemned is neither. The recent Shooter, as ridiculous as it was, plays like one of the greatest thrillers of all time compared to this nonsense.

Action films can be entertaining and meaningful. Terminator 2 used violence to push forth an anti-violence message, but the thing is, that movie was damn entertaining and offered up explosive action sequences to boot. The Condemned, by comparison, is more on par with that terrifyingly awful Steven Seagal flick On Deadly Ground. Do you remember that debacle? It's the one where Seagal spends the last fifteen minutes of the film delivering a hilarious monologue about protecting our environment, this coming not but two minutes after he blows up an oil rig in the middle of the ocean. Preach on Brother Steven!

In addition to the previous mentioned Seagal flick, The Condemned also takes action cues from The Running Man, Battle Royale, No Escape, and Rambo and tries to mesh them with the satirical edge of Natural Born Killers and the little seen Series 7: The Contenders, with a dash of Survivor thrown in for good measure. Unfortunately, none of this stuff really works.

Attempting to hold the film together is wrestling star Stone Cold Steve Austin, and while this ripped muscle man has the tough guy look, he appears uncomfortable throughout most of The Condemned and he isn't shot particularly well (with the cameras, I should clarify). James Cameron knows how to shoot Arnold Schwarzenegger. George P. Cosmatos (God rest his soul) knew how to shoot Sylvester Stallone. Sadly, director Scott Wiper knows how to shoot himself in the foot. He certainly has no success elevating Stone Cold Steve to mythic status, granted better writing certainly would have helped.

The Condemned – drags its social commentary along about as gracefully as a port-a-potty behind a Prius. And as a result is self conscious to the point of absolute absurdity. This movie shamelessly tries to have it's cake and eat it too, and the end result is a film that is witless, ugly, mean, and as laughable as it is condemnable. At least the WWE's last movie, the silly horror flick See No Evil, had no such pretensions, they knew it was a silly horror flick and, though no classic, it worked. Wiper presents us with a world full of unsympathetic thugs doing nasty, inhumane things to one another, and, believe it or not, this guy really, really wants us to care. Wipe this.

May 26, 2010

Beach Red review

Filed under: Uncategorized — moviestargate @ 7:05 pm
“This neglected war film is
as rough and tumble as any Sam Fuller film, as poignant a reflection of
the racial divides in the military as any WW11 film made before the 1960s.”

Reviewed by Dennis Schwartz

Beach Red” undoubtedly had a positive influence on two recent
World War 11 films that had the same theme — Terrence Malick’s “
The
Thin Red Line (98)” and Steven Spielberg’s “Saving Private Ryan
(98),” only Cornel Wilde’s film is the more powerful and impactful one.
Spielberg’s film pales in authencity even in its celebrated landing on
the beach scene, which Wilde depicted in just as gory a realistic way.
It should also be noted that Malick’s film suffered from too many pretentious
moments of philosophizing.

There is an eeriness about this film that strangely brings you into
its poetical rhythms and long silences the men experience as they cross
the jungle and fight in a place called Beach Red. The men at war think
to themselves how lucky they are if they don’t get killed or maimed by
the Japanese fire raining down on them from the hilltop bunkers and pillboxes.
The mission is to take a well-fortified Japanese held island.

The first casuality that grabs the attention of the men is of the
popular soldier called Mouse, who gets his arm shot off, as he winces in
pain and the horrors of the war hit home for all his buddies thinking to
themselves how they would feel about losing an arm. Some soldiers say they
would rather be dead.

The film will work its way through all the action scenes by highlighting
four soldiers, who generally are reflective of all the marine’s views.
It uses the clichés about these men to push its story further than
its clichés, to eventually show the bigger picture of why there
is war. The men are heard thinking out loud in much the same way Malick
used this device in his film, but here it seems more natural and was done
some 30 years before he did it. Also, it doesn’t interfere with the battle
scenes in progress but adds to the humanization of the soldiers, showing
what they are thinking about in the middle of the war. What also helps
give this film a very real look, is that the men come across as soldiers
trying to act rather than actors trying to be soldiers.

Captain MacDonald (Wilde) is in civilian life a lawyer, happily married
with a child, who has been called back to the service for the war. He is
honor-bound to fight the right way which means to fight as hard as he can,
even if he knows that he hates the war and only loves his wife. His one
wish is to return safely to her. In his private thoughts, we hear how much
he misses his wife and how much he cares for the men under his command.
He has earned their respect with his excellent leadership and courage he
shows in battle.

Download Aliens in the Attic Full Movie dvd

In contrast, career Sergeant Honeywell (Torn) is the platoon leader
with a compunction to kill and fight to win anyway he can. On one patrol
he captures a Japanese prisoner, bringing him back alive as ordered for
interrogation. Honeywell is angered that the prisoner shot two of his men,
and therefore he breaks both his arms before bringing him in.

The general feelings of the typical soldier is reflected in the two
opposites who become best friends: Private Egan (Burr) is a 24-year-old
uneducated Southerner from a town that had no flush toilets; the military
seems like a better deal for him than what he had in civilian life; Private
Cliff (Wolfe) is a 19-year-old minister’s son from a more sophisticated
town, who wants to return to college and be a lawyer after the war and
marry the girl he is sweet on. Through their private thoughts we see how
they both have a woman constantly on their mind and how the more mentally
developed Cliff, he’s the one with the more real relationship, is wondering
about what kind of God would allow this war to go on where so many innocent
boys get killed.

The most telling episode is when a four-man patrol is sent out to
gather information about the Japs and the patrol leader Sgt. Lindstrom
is severely wounded. Private Colombo (Sanchez) wants no part of this war,
he is only concerned with his own safety. He tells Egan and Cliff that
he is going back and will take Lindstrom to get medical help. Egan and
Cliff decide to carry on with the mission even though they are both afraid
to be alone, fearing that they are  inexperienced. Meanwhile Colombo
has thoughts about leaving Lindstrom and going back alone and other thoughts
of getting a medal for rescuing him, as he wrestles with his conscience
trying to decide which is the better thing for him to do.

This brilliant, subtle film that connects war with the everyday attitudes
of mankind, as it penetrates the soul of those in combat. It does it better
than most films of this genre. This neglected war film is as rough and
tumble as any Sam Fuller film, as poignant a reflection of the racial divides
in the military as any WW11 film made before the 1960s. It leaves a lasting
impression that is both haunting and expansive. It strikes home in earnest
when Cornel Wilde says, “That the trouble with killing, is that soon we
forget why we are doing it.”

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress